|
|
Post by President Bao on Nov 22, 2014 4:24:27 GMT
Administrators response to rule breaches will be as follows:All infractions will be recorded on the public 'Warning Board'. This allows the community to scrutinise the rulings for consistency/equality, see that rules are being enforced satisfactorily, and to learn from their peers example to better understand what is and is not considered acceptable. For 99% of people the below details will not be relevant, however:Breaches of the rules will result in a strike being recorded against your account - The first time a user breaches a rule, a verbal warning will be publicly given and recorded, this is a curtsey that you will only be afforded once. Each Strike is worth 10 points, and you can receive up to four strikes at once if your misconduct is judged as severe or flagrant enough. For each strike you will receive a ban of increasing duration as follows: 10 - 5 minutes 20 - 30 minutes 30 - 1 hour 40 - 6 hours 50 - 12 hours 60 - 1 day 70 - 2 days 80 - 5 days 90 - 5 days (again) 100 - permanent Each Month, your warning will drop by 5 points *if* it is above 50. You will never be able to reduce your warning level below 50 though. As per the updated rules process, this thread is where all warning against members will be posted. We are cracking down on rule breaches and creating a more methodical process. To quote the rules section; This allows the community to scrutinise the rulings for consistency/equality, see that rules are being enforced satisfactorily, and to learn from their peers example to better understand what is and is not considered acceptable.Format for the warning board will be as follows - Member Name: who was given the strike, linking their profile Warning Amount: [old value] -> [new value] (duration of ban) Reason for Warning: why they are being giving this warning, including the specific rule(s) they were breaking and a link to the thread and ideally a copy of the specific expert in question. So as an example of something you might see on the warning board: (though hopefully not often) ------ |
|
|
|
Post by President Bao on Nov 23, 2014 6:52:16 GMT
For our backlog we have three entires, this list is not really back dated from before it's implementation, but I did want them recorded in some fashion and aligned with the process as it now exists.
---
Member Name: Kojima
Warning Amount: 0 -> 40
Reason for Warning:
Witnessed by Pieter, Oni, Hitake, Milac, Kadabra
Not communicating respectfully and acting overly-aggressive during the injury discussion netted Kojima a warning, and his continuation of such arguments in the cbox despite direct staff requests to stop at the time are what prompted the high warn rating. This was not the first time similar conduct was observed, and while being passionate is a good thing, actively discouraging discussion and involvement with others via this sort of exchange was viewed as disrespectful and in breach of rules 1). (Act maturely, friendly and responsibly). and 5). (Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated).
----
Member Name: Ninjin
Warning Amount: 0 -> 10
Reason for Warning:
For a dispute which occurred in cbox shortly before these new rulings were enacted, the exchange itself was not heated but it was not the desired conduct of a future mod; it created an uncomfortable environment for fellow members and is not the kind of activity we wish to see in cbox. Rule in breach was 5). (Bad behaviour in the c-box will not be tolerated). Therefore both parties had received a 10 point warning.
----
Member Name: Emer
Warning Amount: 0 -> 10
Reason for Warning:
For a dispute which occurred in cbox shortly before these new rulings were enacted, the exchange itself was not heated but it was not the desired conduct of a future mod; it created an uncomfortable environment for fellow members and is not the kind of activity we wish to see in cbox. Rule in breach was 5). (Bad behaviour in the c-box will not be tolerated). Therefore both parties had received a 10 point warning.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pieter Wolfbane on Dec 11, 2014 3:00:12 GMT
Member Name: XicorWarning Amount: 0->20 Reason for Warning: Witnessed by Athren, Pieter, Ninjin, and Kadbra. Violation of the following rules were both observed, both occurring in the cbox: 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. Insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination during your daily discourse; 5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. |
|
|
|
Post by President Bao on Dec 26, 2014 13:16:22 GMT
(Noting: Emer's earlier infraction was deemed to be in error, as the incident in question was pointed out to have not actually involved any misconduct on his own part during the exchange. I concede that in face of the evidence from witnesses at the time, Emer was indeed undeserving of the strike. The message above however will remain unedited to maintain transparency and keep a proper record of what had been penned at the time). Unfortunately, we again have some rule breaking or other concerning conduct which has occurred. Member Name: EmerWarning Amount: 0 -> 40 (6 hour ban) Reason for Warning: (read from bottom to top) SSJ Rage: now 22 Dec 14, 09:31 PM SSJ Rage: just drop it 22 Dec 14, 09:31 PM SSJ Rage: I'm done arguing 22 Dec 14, 09:30 PM
Emer: Y is what Percent of X ? Y/X = P%22 Dec 14, 09:30 PM SSJ Rage: *Goes back to posting* 22 Dec 14, 09:30 PM
Emer: you just proved my point
22 Dec 14, 09:30 PM
Emer: dude22 Dec 14, 09:30 PM SSJ Rage: random* 22 Dec 14, 09:30 PM SSJ Rage: there you go 22 Dec 14, 09:30 PM SSJ Rage: hit calculate 22 Dec 14, 09:30 PM SSJ Rage: and type in a range percentage with the number 22 Dec 14, 09:30 PM SSJ Rage: www.calculatorsoup.com/calculators/math/percentage.php go there 22 Dec 14, 09:30 PM SSJ Rage: you want to have the percentage number? 22 Dec 14, 09:30 PM SSJ Rage: fine 22 Dec 14, 09:29 PM Fukusha Oranjo: Hey Tomare 22 Dec 14, 09:28 PM Tomare: Its allright everyone *^* 22 Dec 14, 09:28 PM
Emer: You need the percentage number to even do that my friend, that's not finding the percentage.22 Dec 14, 09:27 PM Pipa: Hey- this is just getting a little out of hand. The number is 7.8%, it is all good 22 Dec 14, 09:27 PM SSJ Rage: prntscr.com/5juk2q 22 Dec 14, 09:27 PM SSJ Rage: of how you figure out a % 22 Dec 14, 09:27 PM SSJ Rage: I'll give a screen shot 22 Dec 14, 09:27 PM SSJ Rage: here 22 Dec 14, 09:27 PM SSJ Rage: flat out 22 Dec 14, 09:27 PM SSJ Rage: okay 22 Dec 14, 09:26 PM
Emer: TELL ME WHERE THE fu** I fu**ing SAID SHE'S 0.0785753126699293% THERE IS NO % SIGN THAT MEANS WHEN STATED AFTERWARDS SHE'S fu**ing 7.8% OF HIS GOD DAMN POWER LEVEL.22 Dec 14, 09:26 PM SSJ Rage: then you tried saying that is how you determine a percentage by using division, but it isn't because division doesn't give a percentage, it gives out how many times a number goes into another, and 441360 doesn't go into 34680 even once 22 Dec 14, 09:26 PM SSJ Rage: which flat out isn't true 22 Dec 14, 09:25 PM SSJ Rage: No you literally tried saying that was how close she was to his 2nd trans 22 Dec 14, 09:25 PM
Emer: I stated after wards she's 7.8% of his pl in doppel form
22 Dec 14, 09:25 PM
Emer: Emer: 34,680/441,360= 0.0785753126699293 <~~ Was the math I did, there is no percentage sign.22 Dec 14, 09:25 PM SSJ Rage: direct quote 22 Dec 14, 09:25 PM Pipa: in percentages 1= 100%. .7 = 70% .07= 7% 22 Dec 14, 09:25 PM SSJ Rage: 34,680/441,360= 0.0785753126699293 22 Dec 14, 09:24 PM SSJ Rage: you said that her trans PL is 0.0785753126699293% 22 Dec 14, 09:24 PM SSJ Rage: Emer 22 Dec 14, 09:24 PM
Emer: what does it give ya.22 Dec 14, 09:24 PM SSJ Rage: not .078 22 Dec 14, 09:24 PM
Emer: move the decimal to the right 2 times.
22 Dec 14, 09:24 PM
Emer: ok22 Dec 14, 09:24 PM SSJ Rage: That is the number you gave me 22 Dec 14, 09:24 PM SSJ Rage: 0.0785753126699293 <---- 22 Dec 14, 09:24 PM
Emer: .078=7.8%22 Dec 14, 09:24 PM SSJ Rage: lmao no it isn't 22 Dec 14, 09:24 PM
Emer: *Bangs head so incredibly hard I break the fu**ing desk* Bya, it's fu**ing elementrary math I'm doing. it's the same fuckign thing as pipa said.22 Dec 14, 09:23 PM SSJ Rage: we know the base, and we know the max number 22 Dec 14, 09:23 PM SSJ Rage: division is used if you don't know the full number 22 Dec 14, 09:23 PM Pipa: Just take Emer's pl and multiply it by .078 and it will be close to Kiba's PL 22 Dec 14, 09:23 PM SSJ Rage: whatever math teacher taught you math is fu**ing retarded because that isn't the way you do it 22 Dec 14, 09:23 PM
Emer: it's basic math
22 Dec 14, 09:22 PM
Emer: Kiba, when dividing for a percentage, take the fu**ing decimale and go over 222 Dec 14, 09:22 PM SSJ Rage: 34680 isn't 0% of 441k 22 Dec 14, 09:22 PM
Emer: ...22 Dec 14, 09:22 PM SSJ Rage: thank you Pipa 22 Dec 14, 09:22 PM Pipa: Using multiplication to check it- .078 (7.8% is the percent) 22 Dec 14, 09:22 PM
Emer: ok wanna see something here than?22 Dec 14, 09:22 PM SSJ Rage: 34680 isn't 0% of 441k 22 Dec 14, 09:22 PM SSJ Rage: lol 22 Dec 14, 09:22 PM SSJ Rage: no 22 Dec 14, 09:22 PM SSJ Rage: but 34680 isn't 0.0785753126699293 22 Dec 14, 09:22 PM
Emer: The way I stated it, is the true percentage.22 Dec 14, 09:21 PM SSJ Rage: I know this 22 Dec 14, 09:21 PM
Emer: We know that, but you aren't 44k22 Dec 14, 09:21 PM SSJ Rage: Answer: Converting percentage to a decimal: 10% = 10 / 100 = 0.1 What is 10% of 441360 = 10% * 441360 = 0.1 * 441360 = 44136 22 Dec 14, 09:19 PM SSJ Rage: that is literally how you find the percentage of a number 22 Dec 14, 09:19 PM SSJ Rage: division makes it so if we know the percentage but not the full number you use that 22 Dec 14, 09:19 PM Fukusha Oranjo: What's Kiba's power level? 22 Dec 14, 09:19 PM
Emer: ... omg hold on22 Dec 14, 09:19 PM SSJ Rage: so we don't do division 22 Dec 14, 09:19 PM
Emer: value when you know what a percentage part is: 1522 Dec 14, 09:18 PM SSJ Rage: and that's what we're trying to figure out 22 Dec 14, 09:18 PM
Emer: But we don't know the percentage.22 Dec 14, 09:18 PM SSJ Rage: that's how to find the percentage of a number 22 Dec 14, 09:18 PM SSJ Rage: v 22 Dec 14, 09:18 PM SSJ Rage: For example, how to solve for a value when you know what a percentage part is: 15 is 10% what number? in equation form is 15/10% = X. We need to first convert the percentage to an equivalent decimal to do our calculation. Converting a percentage to a decimal we remove the percentage sign and divide by 100. 22 Dec 14, 09:18 PM
Emer: You get fractions and percentage with Division Kiba.
22 Dec 14, 09:18 PM
Emer: you take your own pl and divide by mine. You never take the higher route.22 Dec 14, 09:18 PM SSJ Rage: Division is about how many times a number goes into another 22 Dec 14, 09:17 PM SSJ Rage: because that's what division is about 22 Dec 14, 09:17 PM
Emer: We're finding the percentage in which you are even to me.22 Dec 14, 09:17 PM SSJ Rage: except we are 22 Dec 14, 09:17 PM
Emer: Kiba,we're not firguring that out.22 Dec 14, 09:17 PM SSJ Rage: not the other way around 22 Dec 14, 09:17 PM SSJ Rage: you're trying to figure out how many times the lower number can go into the higher 22 Dec 14, 09:17 PM SSJ Rage: 441360/34680 22 Dec 14, 09:17 PM SSJ Rage: wrong 22 Dec 14, 09:17 PM
Emer: 34,680/441,360 pipa22 Dec 14, 09:17 PM SSJ Rage: the way you did it means that it can't 22 Dec 14, 09:16 PM SSJ Rage: because 34680 CAN go into 441360 22 Dec 14, 09:16 PM Pipa: give me the numbers and I will do it 22 Dec 14, 09:16 PM SSJ Rage: it's higher number divided by the lower 22 Dec 14, 09:16 PM
Emer: me*
22 Dec 14, 09:16 PM
Emer: And I didn't divide wrong trust ,e.22 Dec 14, 09:16 PM SSJ Rage: 12.72664359861592 <--That's what you should've gotten Emer 22 Dec 14, 09:16 PM Pipa: .078 mean 7.8% 22 Dec 14, 09:16 PM SSJ Rage: and besides you divided wrong anyway 22 Dec 14, 09:15 PM
Emer: which would mean you're 8% of my power level in doppel form.22 Dec 14, 09:15 PM SSJ Rage: to figure out percentages 22 Dec 14, 09:15 PM
Emer: I did you own divide by my own22 Dec 14, 09:15 PM SSJ Rage: that's what you're supposed to do <.< 22 Dec 14, 09:15 PM
Emer: I wasn't doing 10%22 Dec 14, 09:15 PM SSJ Rage: 10% of 44136 isn't 0.0785753126699293 22 Dec 14, 09:15 PM SSJ Rage: no... you aren't 22 Dec 14, 09:15 PM SSJ Rage: 10% of 441360 is 44136 22 Dec 14, 09:15 PM
Emer: Take your own pl and divide by my own.
22 Dec 14, 09:14 PM
Emer: And you're suppose to divide.22 Dec 14, 09:14 PM
Emer: well it would be currently listed, but someone hasn't added it in yet >.>22 Dec 14, 09:14 PM SSJ Rage: you're dividing 22 Dec 14, 09:14 PM SSJ Rage: and that's not how you determine % lol 22 Dec 14, 09:14 PM SSJ Rage: I'm talking about what's currently listed lol 22 Dec 14, 09:14 PM SSJ Rage: now her trans is about 44% of his base PL 22 Dec 14, 09:14 PM
Emer: I was talking about doppelganger, which is what he can currently achieve XD22 Dec 14, 09:14 PM Pipa: "I wish... that Emer was an acrosian" *Poof* 735,800 pl. Site doomed 22 Dec 14, 09:13 PM
Emer: 34,680/441,360= 0.078575312669929322 Dec 14, 09:13 PM SSJ Rage: still not within winable range (Unless he takes a dive) but still You have been given the maximum single-instance warning because, as a moderator, you must always follow the rulings and processes in place for disciplining members. Your original exchange(attached above) is deemed to have eventually breached rule 5) 'Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated' as your frustrations grew (it was unnecessary for it to become the argument that it did, transforming good intentions into an unpleasant experience with the negativities actually originating on your side) however, the *main* issue here is that banning SSJ Rage from cbox was not part of accepted practice. Administrators must follow the rulings in place (especially when it comes to administering/maintaining discpline). If SSJ Rage's(aka Kojima/Kiba) behaviour was considered unacceptable to you, then a warning should have been giving,like the one you are currently reading, with supporting evidence given in justification and punishment as outlined here: wodsouls.freeforums.net/thread/1125/updated-rules-staff-processThis is a very serious matter, staff conduct must not be considered in abuse of the authority they are given. If in future there is any further misappropriation of authority, you will be automatically stripped of any staff title, alongside the corresponding regular repercussions of the associated warning level. --- Member Name: KojimaWarning Amount: 20 -> 60 (1 day ban) Reason for Warning: A cumulation of several recent misconducts, in the same stream as previous issues these mainly correlate to behaviour in cbox and disrespect in threads. The thing is you DO get better grades for rping with others then you would solo. It's a known fact that you do. There is your incentive to go out and rp with others. You've once had an issue with people not reading your stuff, well start reading everything. Because if you had read everything you would have SEEN I stated that you got better stuff for rping with others outside of solo training threads. I feel the limit should be kept for several reasons that I've stated above, one of them being that if it were removed the flood gates would open and staff would be completely over run with posts to grade. (It will happen if its removed) TYVM but I DID fucking read it. If you understand that we do then you should bloody well know that there is literally no reason to limit someone's ability to do solo threads. You're going against your own words by saying that limiting someone's ability to do solo threads should be allowed. I didn't read it all because there was no fucking reason too read it all when you literally just say exactly what I did except for some reason disagree with it. Your post makes no sense, You say that we have incentivized ways of making it so people rp with others but agree with FORCING them to have too? Seriously? You're agreeing and wanting people to be restricted in a board that so heavily tries to emphasize power to the RPers? Really? Really? REALLY? Fact of the matter is even if, As you claim, Staff are "Swamped with threads to grade" that doesn't mean they HAVE to fucking grade them ASAP. Yea it'd be nice but they still have lives and, honestly, as it is, The staff were ALREADY swamped. Limiting it or not it literally changes nothing except giving people more FREEDOM, which hey guess what? THIS BOARD EMPHASIZES IT WANTS TO DO. From: wodsouls.freeforums.net/thread/1357/rules-poll-discussionAnd - 1: i.imgur.com/rSGiA4J.png2: i.imgur.com/wa2XSKH.png3: i.imgur.com/xajPyGR.png4: i.imgur.com/NtKMaxx.png5: i.imgur.com/3hrIabv.png6: i.imgur.com/dy7twkQ.png7: i.imgur.com/Q70zzPC.png8: i.imgur.com/cwG3wUL.png9: i.imgur.com/BMeI4x4.png10: i.imgur.com/MEEt6Ns.pngFrom cbox In the first case above, your manner is disrespectful and aggressive, breaching rule 1) 'Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.'The swearing and snapping at people is completely unneeded and not the sort of conduct which is acceptable on this site. In the second case, your manner was largely disrespectful and inflammatory, and your flagrant disregard for multiple moderators asking (both of) you to stop/take it to a thread where it belongs is a clear breach of the conduct you agreed to abide by when signing up and playing on this site. You are more than welcome to (respectfully and constructively) criticise the processes or even conduct of staff on this site, myself definitely included, but you are not to do so in a manner which goes against the rules which are in place. The rules in breach are: 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.and 5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)Unfortunately, this latest warning now places you over the half way line, in so much as one more breach of this severity will result in an immediate permanent ban, something no body wants (as we do genuinely enjoy your company outside of these particular incidents/dramas). We cannot however have you acting disrespectfully and detracting from the fun and friendly place this exists to be, it is not acceptable. --- Member Name: NinjinWarning Amount: 10 -> 50 (12 hour ban) Reason for Warning: 1: i.imgur.com/rSGiA4J.png
2: i.imgur.com/wa2XSKH.png
3: i.imgur.com/xajPyGR.png
4: i.imgur.com/NtKMaxx.png
5: i.imgur.com/3hrIabv.png
6: i.imgur.com/dy7twkQ.png
7: i.imgur.com/Q70zzPC.png
8: i.imgur.com/cwG3wUL.png
9: i.imgur.com/BMeI4x4.png
10: i.imgur.com/MEEt6Ns.png
From cbox You too were involved in the above cbox misconduct as a moderator and are expected to lead by example. It created an uncomfortable and unwelcoming environment for others and gives a very unprofessional and unsavoury appearance to the entire administration of this site. As a manager of a site of your own, you should know this well and have given the role and responsibilities it presents more respect than that. Like Koj you are welcome to disagree with things and discuss them, but that would belong in a constructive and respectfully written thread or PM(like the one that is indeed already in progress). As a moderator you are not exempt from the rules of your fellow members, if anything expected to maintain and even higher standard. The rules in breach were 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.and 5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)
|
|
|
|
Post by Pieter Wolfbane on Jan 4, 2015 1:02:32 GMT
Member Name: Athren, TomaWarning Amount: Athren, as a staff member, your warning is being doubled up. 0-->20 Toma- 0-->10 Reason for Warning: Infringement upon the first rule of the forum--> 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse. Witnessed by the now gone once more Emer, Nai-Ran, and myself. The event has caused Emer to leave the forum once more due to the two players becoming annoyed they could not rejoin the saga that Emer had been trying to set up since the tenth of December. The event had occurred in the cbox, whilst Emer had been invisible on the forum, looking around at things. Nai-Ran had come on later, to check the site and the cbox, seeing this in the cbox and screen capping it. Part 1: i.imgur.com/jkwOvCX.pngPart 2: i.imgur.com/jRKCNoT.pngWhile, yes, there is a problem with a lot of information not being straight forward on the site, it is not acceptable for this to happen. It needs to be notified that there isn't any information on the said matter (in this case, the rejoining of a saga after deletion of post for joining).
|
|
|
|
Post by President Bao on Feb 22, 2015 6:55:54 GMT
Member Name: Orache/ Naroka/various other accounts Warning Amount: 0 -> 40 (6 hour ban) Reason for Warning: Your above behaviour was disgusting. I'm not even going to bother to elaborate as I'm sure you're acutely aware of everything wrong with this ridiculous display. Rule breaches in question - 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.
2) Slang words and swear words are allowed, but not used in a manner used to offend or hurt another person. Discriminatory terms are NOT allowed in any sense. Finally, if we have any complaints about the amount of foul language used this rule could be changed, so try to limit yourself.
3) No public sexual content, even in roleplay. If you so desire, this can be pursued off-site with another member. The site must remain friendly to 13-and-unders.
5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)Your ban will last for 6 hours, and I never want to see such petulant behaviour ever again. This was foolishness and only succeeded in damaging your own reputation. You are lucky that the warning system is capped or you would very likely be facing a permanent ban. If I see or hear of something like that again I will not hesitate to remove you from not just here but anywhere I have involvement with, I have zero tolerance for such flagrant misconduct. --------- Member Name: DaikiWarning Amount: 0 -> 40 (6 hour ban) Reason for Warning: Disrespecting mods and acting in such a manner is not acceptable. You kept that exchange going on way longer than needed in a ridiculous attempt to have the last word. You are every bit to blame as Athren in that respect, cause it takes two to have a fight. If you simply reported the issue then removed yourself from the situation/ignored Ora's utter foolishness then you could have gotten off scot free, just gather evidence and quietly forward it on. Instead, you are now receiving punishment and a tarnished record yourself... Rules breached include 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.
5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)Your ban will also be lasting for 6 hours, cbox misbehaviour is not acceptable. --------- Member Name: GreyFoxWarning Amount: 0 -> 20 (30 minute ban) Reason for Warning: What I said to Dai above also applies to you, you need to respect your fellow members, especially moderators. I have been told that your disrespect of direct moderator requests and conduct was the instigator of this issue, and your continued chipping in just fanned the flames (arguing that you are not arguing is pointless and hypocritical.). Rules breached include: 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.
5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)You are new here, so I am disappointed that I have to already give you a warning. I hope however that this was a momentary lapse and that you will not repeat the rule breaches you demonstrated in this incident. If not, then do not expect to last long, as cumulative strikes will soon result in permanent removal from this site. --------- Member Name: AthrenWarning Amount: 20 -> 60 (1 day ban) Reason for Warning: Athren... not only was your own conduct in breach of the rules, you also validated Ora's despicable conduct, completely turning a blind eye to it during that exchange. You can't honestly expect any sort of respect when such a figure is seen to represent/be aligned with you. You undermined your own authority completely with that, and as someone who has run their own forum I would have expected you to be much more aware of such things. Additionally you were just as bad as Daikai when it came to 'needing the last word, it was a ridiculous display and one which will not be repeated. You are the authority, 'the last word' is a childs plaything, you don't need the 'last word' because you hold the final say. Trying to twist their arm whenever they attempted to recant or quietened down, (purely an exercise of ego) only served to re-inflame the situation several times - success is measured by results, and your actions achieved the exact opposite of defusing the issue. It's all about respect, and the rules you broke in this case were: 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.
5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)Given you already have a warning, your current one has accumulated to be a 1 day ban. We also have that pm running discussing stategies for you to rectify these situations and how to address such problems.
|
|
Zucceta
Administrator
PL: 379,083
Oozaru(x10) MSSj(x15) S.Ooz(x22) SSj2(25x)
Zeni: 2290
Tag: @admin
OOC Name: therevolution
Posts: 2,309
|
Post by Zucceta on Feb 26, 2015 22:47:19 GMT
Member Name: Zucceta
Warning Amount: 0 -> 20 (duration of ban)
Reason for Warning: While conversing in the cbox, Bya entered in the cbox and demanded that his PL be graded in his thread with Ninjin. Vipoi, as per protocol, asked him to place it in the graded threads area. Bya informed him it was. I asked him whether he had specified to Pipa that he wanted PL, as the moderator had asked in the said thread. He did not respond directly to me question, twice, insisting upon a point that was irrelevant to my questioning both times, subsequently inflaming me and, in a bad move, I insulted him. I subsequently regretted this and tried to delete it before he saw, to no avail. I attempted an apology, but nonetheless this discourse was unprofessional and punishable. I have hence given myself a 20 (10, doubled for staff misdemeanor). If this is considered too low, then further judgement is accepted.
5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)
|
|
Nai-Ran
Archived
(Transferred to Kari-Ko)
Tag: @nairan
Posts: 450 
|
Post by Nai-Ran on Mar 8, 2015 8:09:41 GMT
Member Name: Kojima/ KibaWarning Amount: [60%] -> [100%] (permanent) Reason for Warning: After much discussion and deliberation among the staff, it has been decided that Bya has disregarded and broken the rules on far too many occasions to remain here any longer. The rules that were broken include: One of the latest instances that you broke the first rule is in your recent PM to Zuccetta. While I personally didn’t see the insult in the Cbox that you’re referring to, I did see that Zuccetta had deleted the message and was apologizing several times for his bad behavior. You are correct that as a staff member, he does need to be held to a higher standard. He was punished accordingly. However, that doesn’t give you the right to continue the matter, especially in such a disrespectful way after it was already taken care of. When using the site’s PM system, keep in mind that you’re putting yourself out there to at least one other member of the site and are still expected to follow the rules in your conduct. Obviously we as staff can’t monitor this since the messages are private. However, that isn’t a pass to skirt around the rules when a member of the conversation feels that it does need to be brought to our attention. If this was the only recent infraction, a permaban wouldn’t have been necessary. However, barely even a week later you violated the rules yet again with your actions here: It saddens me that what you took away from all of your previous warnings was that the staff was out to get you. In reality this has never been true. If you had not been so consistent in your disrespectfulness and lack of regard for the rules, there’s a good chance that there would never have had any problems. Unlike what you seem to be insisting, the staff hasn’t been on your case from day 1. It took nearly two months for you to receive your first warning since joining us, and you were warned on several occasions beforehand that your behavior was unacceptable. You chose not to listen not only back then, but also on several occasions since then as indicated by your previous warnings above. Now it has ultimately led to this. The staff that you took issue have in fact been punished appropriately as well. Nobody can open your eyes to this but you. Unfortunately, you weren’t able to do so before you reached the point of no return.
|
|
Vi-Poi
Administrator
Premier of Earth
PL: 434,410
Soul(x40P), Overdrive(x43)
Zeni: 1,247
Tag: @vipoi
Posts: 2,833 
|
Post by Vi-Poi on Mar 13, 2015 6:47:29 GMT
Member Name: GurinWarning Amount: 0 -> 10 (10 minutes) Reason for Warning:Rules breach includes: 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.
5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. Gurin, you've been on the edges of disrespectful behavior, and not communicating respectfully with other players while in the cbox. You've also been making repeated requests for immediate review of posted material after having been warned not to do so. Even if you add just joking to the end of it, it's still a violation.
|
|
Zucceta
Administrator
PL: 379,083
Oozaru(x10) MSSj(x15) S.Ooz(x22) SSj2(25x)
Zeni: 2290
Tag: @admin
OOC Name: therevolution
Posts: 2,309
|
Post by Zucceta on Mar 18, 2015 22:56:20 GMT
Member Name: DaikiWarning Amount: [40] -> [60] (1 Day) Reason for Warning: 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse. 5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.) You over-reacted to a major degree in the chatbox regarding Vipoi's saga event, not listening to my reason regarding his attack (that ki attacks intended on destroying planets have to have destructive intent behind them, which Vipoi's charged attack clearly does not given his mission statement). You repeatedly ignored me and slandered Vi-Poi, and I believe this is a form of bullying. Your manner was an obvious passive-aggressive for the majority of the time. Your over-reaction and inability to listen to what anyone was telling you has ultimately earned you this day-long ban.
|
|
Vi-Poi
Administrator
Premier of Earth
PL: 434,410
Soul(x40P), Overdrive(x43)
Zeni: 1,247
Tag: @vipoi
Posts: 2,833
|
Post by Vi-Poi on Mar 23, 2015 17:36:21 GMT
Member Name: Orache / Naroka / Others Warning Amount: [40] -> [50] (12 hour ban) Reason for Warning: 5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)When a staff member asks people to stop on the cbox, things have to stop on the cbox. It's draining to police behavior that shouldn't exist. Ora, when these sorts of things arise in the cbox listen to the staff member, and go cool off. ----- Member Name: SnipparWarning Amount: [0] -> [10] (10 minutes) Reason for Warning:5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)
Snippar, the cbox is considered an extension of the site. All rules of conduct and respect apply just as they would in the forums. When a staff member says for things to stop, they should stop, without anyone trying to get in a last word or retaliate.
|
|
|
|
Post by President Bao on Mar 26, 2015 14:52:42 GMT
Member Name: Ora (aka Naroka/Korudo) Warning Amount: [50] -> [60] Reason for Warning: Now you slow your mu'fuckin horses you cockamamie woman. I didn't apologize to get spared. I apologized because I didn't wanna butt heads with some guy over the fuckin' net. Dont use my name just so you can get some sympathy, get it? I was tryna get out the DE so that I wasn't locked in the same fucking thread for over an entire fuckin' month. Would you? Oh wait, you have your techs and transformations and whatnot. So fuck off. 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse. 2) Slang words and swear words are allowed, but not used in a manner used to offend or hurt another person. Discriminatory terms are NOT allowed in any sense. Finally, if we have any complaints about the amount of foul language used this rule could be changed, so try to limit yourself. ...come on man, I want to go to bed, not have to be giving out bans... |
|
Zucceta
Administrator
PL: 379,083
Oozaru(x10) MSSj(x15) S.Ooz(x22) SSj2(25x)
Zeni: 2290
Tag: @admin
OOC Name: therevolution
Posts: 2,309
|
Post by Zucceta on Mar 28, 2015 22:13:30 GMT
Member Name: Athren
Warning Amount: [60] -> [100] (indefinite)
Reason for Warning: 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.
2) Slang words and swear words are allowed, but not used in a manner used to offend or hurt another person. Discriminatory terms are NOT allowed in any sense. Finally, if we have any complaints about the amount of foul language used this rule could be changed, so try to limit yourself. I asked him to stop swearing at me when trying to resolve the situation.
5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)
2) You cannot kill another member's character without their expressed permission during normal RP. Killing a character in a saga if your character is in the position to do so is allowed, with admin permission and if the rules are set beforehand.
I don't really need to say much more that people don't already know. Athren, a member who, due to his staff experience and importance, should not have acted in such a manner, slandering fellow staff and other members, and offering up multiple 'ultimatums' of leaving if he didn't get his way. Despite saying he was 'leaving', he repeatedly appeared in the cbox (one's opinion might surmise, to try and draw attention to himself) and when I asked him to either go properly or apologise to the member he offended in question, he refused.
|
|
Vi-Poi
Administrator
Premier of Earth
PL: 434,410
Soul(x40P), Overdrive(x43)
Zeni: 1,247
Tag: @vipoi
Posts: 2,833
|
Post by Vi-Poi on Apr 2, 2015 19:57:15 GMT
Member Name: SnipparWarning Amount: [10] -> [20] (30 minutes) Reason for Warning:1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly.You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse
5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)
Insulting a moderator who is discussing Roleplay Rules is not the best way to start out, Snippar. The c-box is an extension of the site, and there is no reason to treat your fellow players with contempt or disrespect.
|
|
Zucceta
Administrator
PL: 379,083
Oozaru(x10) MSSj(x15) S.Ooz(x22) SSj2(25x)
Zeni: 2290
Tag: @admin
OOC Name: therevolution
Posts: 2,309
|
Post by Zucceta on May 9, 2015 15:59:36 GMT
Member Name: Daiki
Warning Amount: [50] -> [70] (2 Days)
Reason for Warning: 1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.
2) Slang words and swear words are allowed, but not used in a manner used to offend or hurt another person. Discriminatory terms are NOT allowed in any sense. Finally, if we have any complaints about the amount of foul language used this rule could be changed, so try to limit yourself.
5) Bad behavior in the c-box will not be tolerated - treat it as an extension of the site. If requested by staff to stop a given discussion in cbox, you are to do so immediately - if requested by a fellow member, then you are also to respect their wishes unless staff expressly say otherwise. (Sometimes cbox is not the right place - If it is truly a discussion you wish to pursue further you should instead create a thread for it.)
I apologise, but I always forget to get screenshots. None the less, I can call on eyewitnesses. Continually flaring up and being aggressive towards fellow members and staff, particularly myself. I have taken the brunt force of your aggressive tendencies these last few weeks ever since I gave a ruling that has been backed up by President Bao, et al members of staff. It is my total fault that I forgot to record the 'slang and swears' used by him at me in this transaction, but once more I can call on eyewitnesses to this flaming.
I asked you apologise to myself and the other staff members involved in this previous transaction; alternatively, I asked you to fill out a grievance form. You did neither. I should have warned you then.
The final straw was this:
therevolution: One more word of intolerance, rudeness or impoliteness to anyone on this forum and I am giving you a warning.
Daiki Iranos: But i still hate you really hard right now ^^
I didn't want to give you any warnings because I'm honestly upset that I have to become the villain in this story, but ultimately, I no longer have any regard for you. It may look to others that I am doing this for a number of biases, but I will not tolerate your attitude or the way you operate.
I will wait on counter-claims/grievances/appeals to act out the ban, but I believe this is deserving.
|
|
