Bing Gan
Administrator
PL: 374,871
Enlightenment (x16P), S. Ascension (x23)
Zeni: 13,528
Tag: @bingg
OOC Name: Bing/Biggums/TruetoCaesar
Posts: 3,722
|
Post by Bing Gan on Jan 10, 2016 10:01:40 GMT
Welcome everyone to the KP Implementation Poll! This is pretty major, so please think carefully about which version you'd like implemented, if any. The system is as follows:
KP SystemEvery player starts a thread with 3 KP maximum. Every post where a player does not use KP generates 1 KP. Tech Type | KP Cost | N1, SU1
| 1 | UP2, V2, SU2 | 2 | MP3, UV3, SU3 | 3 |
Only Combat-Action SUs drain KP when used. These include Afterimage or similar dodging techs, Solar Flare, offensive add-ons. Passive SUs or SUs not directly related to combat such as Ki Sense and its relatives, Ki Suppression, etc. have 0 KP cost. Senzu beans restore all KP [Limit 1 per fight]. Dodge RulesSU1 Dodge: Up to 100% of PL SU2 Dodge: Up to 200% of PL SU3 Dodge: Up to 300% of PL Keep in mind, Special Skills also fall in the 3 Cost Category!
|
|
A
Newcomer
PL: 3,500
Overdrive(x3)
Zeni: 3,937
Tag: @a
OOC Name: Letrune
Posts: 34
|
Post by A on Jan 10, 2016 10:17:22 GMT
I believe it would make threads more tactical, especially DEs. May I ask how the KP would be used? Like, one turn of defense takes one KP, but running away raises it?
|
|
Bing Gan
Administrator
PL: 374,871
Enlightenment (x16P), S. Ascension (x23)
Zeni: 13,528
Tag: @bingg
OOC Name: Bing/Biggums/TruetoCaesar
Posts: 3,722
|
Post by Bing Gan on Jan 10, 2016 10:41:46 GMT
A Well the way it works is mostly explained in my post above, but if there's something you don't fully understand, I'd be more than glad to explain it further.
|
|
|
Post by Basil on Jan 10, 2016 11:27:10 GMT
I enjoy the system and after its first few trial runs i've used it in every combat thread, DE or not, i've been involved in. My vote's on mandatory for all types, but i'd be fine with just mandatory for DE. I'm one of the people that exclusively uses it for combat because I find it more balanced than freeform, so I may be a bit biased. But then again if two people would really want to free form, i'd have no issue with it, not that I would make the switch myself.
|
|
|
Post by Raisu Hanamura on Jan 10, 2016 13:15:31 GMT
I'd also be in favor of implementation of it. Definitely for DE threads, without a doubt, as I feel it's a fair way for things to work. For non-DE threads, I feel it can remain optional, solely because some parties might just be interested in freeform combat over this, though I personally adhere to it even when a thread is not using it.
|
|
Vi-Poi
Administrator
Premier of Earth
PL: 434,410
Soul(x40P), Overdrive(x43)
Zeni: 1,247
Tag: @vipoi
Posts: 2,833
|
Post by Vi-Poi on Jan 12, 2016 3:06:20 GMT
Voting is done and rule is up.
|
|