|
Post by Azguard on Oct 17, 2016 20:08:05 GMT
I'll keep this brief, because I'm not entirely sure of whether or not this is worth bringing up, but it ground my gears a little too hard.
Earlier, myself (Vio) and Izanagi (whose on-site characters I am not yet familiar with) were discussing something regarding opinions and facts. This seems to have stemmed from an off-site incident which Izanagi experienced, so I can understand if they were feeling angered/frustrated as a result. However, throughout this discussion, things started to go a little circular. Sure, that can't be helped at times, but it got to the point where numerous misunderstandings were made - and those misunderstandings devolved into what I personally saw as childish bites at trivialities in the wake of an otherwise normal debate.
I believe Izanagi's frustration originated from someone's opinion on said other site being taken as fact by that site's staff, and thus they were refuting any attempts at allowing such a thing to be disputed. Understandably frustrating. The conversation Izanagi and I had on CBox revolved around the definition of fact versus opinion. I wholly agreed with Izanagi that what was said elsewhere was not factual, and should not have been considered as such, but I think that might have been lost in translation. No matter what I said (I often included "regardless" and "no matter what" in my explanations), it seemed Izanagi was not willing to take what I was saying into account; perhaps blinded by their own frustration over the original ordeal that had sparked this.
The following are screenshots of the debate in question (entailing the entire conversation from first mention to final points):
Part 1 Part 2 Part 3 Part 4 Part 5 Part 6 Part 7 Part 8 Part 9 Part 10 Part 11 Part 12 Part 13 Part 14 Part 15 Part 16 (Final)
I'll be the first to admit, I got really heated up towards the end of that, and most definitely overstepped my own personal bounds when it comes to situations such as these. As evidenced, I even apologised for some of my less than favourable retorts almost immediately after the fact. However, while it was the downward spiral of the conversation that got to me, there are some parts that I don't think should have been included even if I personally agreed with them to an extent.
Anyway, that's all. If this seems trivial, then fine by me; I put this up more for peace of mind and have otherwise no personal conflict with Izanagi.
|
|
Bing Gan
Administrator
![*](//storage.proboards.com/5453652/images/4UDoz9cSMEuQdCvphTYU.png)
PL: 374,871
Enlightenment (x16P), S. Ascension (x23)
Zeni: 13,528
Tag: @bingg
OOC Name: Bing/Biggums/TruetoCaesar
Posts: 3,722
|
Post by Bing Gan on Oct 18, 2016 4:40:23 GMT
Your Grievance has been filed. Izanagi has been given a warn due to the evidence presented.
|
|