Post by Tundrik on Jun 10, 2016 14:46:32 GMT
I'll go ahead and make this, seeing as I was blindsided by the occurrence as much as I was the overwhelming reports already filed in the past against Kaula.
So, I will immediately point out that I did something wrong and (as Kaula gave me a warning and banned me for) argued with them. I'm not here to contest that as arguing was against the rules and uncalled for. However, I'll supply screenshots of the warning as it happened, along with the rest of the evidence I have in a single link, here: Evidence Here ( imgur.com/a/5v7tp )
Now, my problem with this whole situation that Kaula has outright done something I can't believe a staff member is allowed to do. I've been apparently "baiting" Kaula and many others and asked for proof, but I feel that what I witnessed was an utter showing of it. Safe to say my reaction is befitting it when I'm quoted a clearly passive-aggressive quote and image post from Kaula, a staff member, but that doesn't mean it was okay. This is where the argument started because it was just insanely shocking for someone to attack me.
Kaula mentioned multiple times that I had been a douche in the chat/baited people and I requested proof or, at the very least, how I baited people. Two situations were named, with Kaula involved in both. One was with Dark Souls (where I was attacked with "git gud" because I didn't understand how Hold Humanities worked and got ganked not once but twice) and the other was with JoJo. I'm certain any proof of the Dark Souls chat is missing and purely based on "he said, she said", but the JoJo bait I can assume was only one of two things I said.
These were the only two things that I can imagine were taken as offensive, but even then the conversation ended after Kaula had linked the JoJo Sister site. I made a joke that made even A7 make some smiley, so I don't see how it did it. However, this is pretty much the sum of how I've been "baiting" or being rude I imagine and it's far more sickening that I was banned. In Kaula's warning message, I'm also remarked as...
I was told I've been reported by multiple people and yet when I argued with Kaula he said that it had to be things being done on site. In short, this ultimately means that either there should be enough proof that this shouldn't have been the first time I was punished or this is purely an off-site "battle" being brought here. Either way, all I've been treated with from Kaula is in their signature. This person is staff and expected to represent the site (unless I'm grossly misunderstanding the lingo or role Kaula fills) and has so far shown nothing but disrespect for their title and has clearly made a joke out of administrative power. If there are issues with a member and there are anonymous reports, it only makes sense that a staff member should compile a grievance and go forward with it. Kaula has instead seen fit to carry out a personal war with me, supplying little proof in the process, using their staff powers and no doubt falsified (hence the lack of a grievance) or simply off-site occurrences to judge me. One of the very same rules quoted against me fits here, along with another or two. The worst part of it all is that Kaula insists I kill the chat when in fact it generally holds the same activity regardless of whether I'm involved or not, perhaps barring when Kaula leaves because I'm there.
Don't like my posts in tech apps or I will ignore your next app for shits and giggles.
Don't piss me off.
1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.
2) Slang words and swear words are allowed, but not used in a manner used to offend or hurt another person. Discriminatory terms are NOT allowed in any sense. Finally, if we have any complaints about the amount of foul language used this rule could be changed, so try to limit yourself.
Edit: I also apparently killed the conversation about JoJo, but it should be noted I was part of the conversation for roughly 6 of the minutes between the supplied "possible baits" and even for a minute or two beforehand. This only goes further to make me confused on what and when I baited, as the conversation kept going until after (I assume) the two left to talk about JoJo on the Sister Site that had been linked beforehand.
Edit 2.5: After hoping to leave this without any further edits (partly due to being accused of "fishing" in the chat by Kaula), I was greeted to another sight of Kaula posting a screen-cap of their new signature. Haven't been able to talk in the chat, and yet the hostility and sheer bad attitude has continued. Further Provoking/Bad Attitude (http://imgur.com/a/EiRKd). In relation to this, however, is the fact that after the ban had been carried out Kaula has consistently attacked me or made jabs at me in the chat despite everyone changing the subject multiple times.
Edit 3, The Edit-ckoning: So I looked at the warning and saw Kaula had added another blip to their warning post.This strikes me as an extremely odd edit that's trying to stack a crowd against me, especially when I'm pretty sure I've tried to discuss a very specific scene in DBS on multiple occasions. Like what does that even have to do with a warning, either? If by all means this is true, I'd like to have proof provided because it seems absurd I'd actively discuss the series in the chat (such as Yamcha who I end up talking about almost daily... which that's probably a crime) if I had an active dislike for it, but it also begs the same question posed.
If I dislike the setting, why am I here?
So, I will immediately point out that I did something wrong and (as Kaula gave me a warning and banned me for) argued with them. I'm not here to contest that as arguing was against the rules and uncalled for. However, I'll supply screenshots of the warning as it happened, along with the rest of the evidence I have in a single link, here: Evidence Here ( imgur.com/a/5v7tp )
Now, my problem with this whole situation that Kaula has outright done something I can't believe a staff member is allowed to do. I've been apparently "baiting" Kaula and many others and asked for proof, but I feel that what I witnessed was an utter showing of it. Safe to say my reaction is befitting it when I'm quoted a clearly passive-aggressive quote and image post from Kaula, a staff member, but that doesn't mean it was okay. This is where the argument started because it was just insanely shocking for someone to attack me.
Kaula mentioned multiple times that I had been a douche in the chat/baited people and I requested proof or, at the very least, how I baited people. Two situations were named, with Kaula involved in both. One was with Dark Souls (where I was attacked with "git gud" because I didn't understand how Hold Humanities worked and got ganked not once but twice) and the other was with JoJo. I'm certain any proof of the Dark Souls chat is missing and purely based on "he said, she said", but the JoJo bait I can assume was only one of two things I said.
These were the only two things that I can imagine were taken as offensive, but even then the conversation ended after Kaula had linked the JoJo Sister site. I made a joke that made even A7 make some smiley, so I don't see how it did it. However, this is pretty much the sum of how I've been "baiting" or being rude I imagine and it's far more sickening that I was banned. In Kaula's warning message, I'm also remarked as...
Reason for Warning: Every time he comes into the cbox it is for the soul purpose of being abrasive towards other people having a conversation or merely attacking them or something they like. Doesn't matter who he does this to to him,
I was told I've been reported by multiple people and yet when I argued with Kaula he said that it had to be things being done on site. In short, this ultimately means that either there should be enough proof that this shouldn't have been the first time I was punished or this is purely an off-site "battle" being brought here. Either way, all I've been treated with from Kaula is in their signature. This person is staff and expected to represent the site (unless I'm grossly misunderstanding the lingo or role Kaula fills) and has so far shown nothing but disrespect for their title and has clearly made a joke out of administrative power. If there are issues with a member and there are anonymous reports, it only makes sense that a staff member should compile a grievance and go forward with it. Kaula has instead seen fit to carry out a personal war with me, supplying little proof in the process, using their staff powers and no doubt falsified (hence the lack of a grievance) or simply off-site occurrences to judge me. One of the very same rules quoted against me fits here, along with another or two. The worst part of it all is that Kaula insists I kill the chat when in fact it generally holds the same activity regardless of whether I'm involved or not, perhaps barring when Kaula leaves because I'm there.
Don't like my posts in tech apps or I will ignore your next app for shits and giggles.
Don't piss me off.
1) Act maturely, friendly and responsibly. You are expected to express yourself in a civil and level-headed manner during discussion or debate, therefore insulting fellow members or staff is forbidden, as is any kind of discrimination, overly aggressive behaviour or general actions which are not deemed by staff to be polite and proper during your daily discourse.
2) Slang words and swear words are allowed, but not used in a manner used to offend or hurt another person. Discriminatory terms are NOT allowed in any sense. Finally, if we have any complaints about the amount of foul language used this rule could be changed, so try to limit yourself.
Edit: I also apparently killed the conversation about JoJo, but it should be noted I was part of the conversation for roughly 6 of the minutes between the supplied "possible baits" and even for a minute or two beforehand. This only goes further to make me confused on what and when I baited, as the conversation kept going until after (I assume) the two left to talk about JoJo on the Sister Site that had been linked beforehand.
Edit 2.5: After hoping to leave this without any further edits (partly due to being accused of "fishing" in the chat by Kaula), I was greeted to another sight of Kaula posting a screen-cap of their new signature. Haven't been able to talk in the chat, and yet the hostility and sheer bad attitude has continued. Further Provoking/Bad Attitude (http://imgur.com/a/EiRKd). In relation to this, however, is the fact that after the ban had been carried out Kaula has consistently attacked me or made jabs at me in the chat despite everyone changing the subject multiple times.
Edit 3, The Edit-ckoning: So I looked at the warning and saw Kaula had added another blip to their warning post.
He even comes in the cbox going on about how much he dislikes DB/DBZ. Why are you even here if you dislike the setting?
If I dislike the setting, why am I here?